Translate this blog

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Eastern Analytical Symposium 2017




Recently I had the privilege of giving a lecture at the annual Eastern Analytical Symposium in Plainsboro Township, NJ. This year, the symposium was held in an elegant new venue, the Crowne Plaza Princeton-Conference Center. I have been attending EAS since 2011 and I think this has been my favorite one so far.  

                My presentation was at 11:00am on Wednesday the 15th. The subject of my lecture was about a method my colleagues and I had been working on for chromatographic assay and organic impurities detection of chlorpheniramine maleate formulations. The current USP method calls for a time-consuming multistep liquid–liquid extraction procedure for the assay, and no method is provided for impurities analysis. Consequently, there was a lot of room for improvement in bringing these methods up-to-date.

As a basic compound, chlorpheniramine may be prone to prone to chromatographic tailing via undesirable electrostatic interaction with residual silanols present on the surface of some traditional silica-based stationary phases. Hence, the moderately hydrophobic Si–H-based surface of Cogent™ columns was postulated to be advantageous in terms of minimizing tailing contributions from this phenomenon.  

                We encountered a few obstacles in method development. The first involved peak splitting for the first two peaks. I had previously selected a diluent with 50% acetonitrile in an effort to ensure solubility of the more hydrophobic analytes, but this choice had the undesired effect of peak splitting. Reducing the organic content in the diluent to 10% resolved this issue. Another encountered problem dealt with trying to use a high enough extract concentration such that we could detect impurity peaks at the 0.1% level while being careful not to overload the column so much that we lost resolution of the critical peak pair. In this case, adjusting the gradient and using a lower mobile phase concentration of trifluoracetic acid (0.05% instead of 0.1%) helped to improve selectivity enough that resolution was sufficient at the higher extract concentration.

                Despite these setbacks, we produced a nice method for subsequent validation studies and I think the audience was quite pleased with the end result. This was my second year as a speaker at EAS and look forward to the opportunity to possibly present again at future meetings! Hope to see you there in 2018!